Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 36(4), November 2010 - Nov 15, 2010 - 11:05 AM

• Craig ID. Introducing SNIP to the Journal of Sexual Medicine. Journal of Sexual Medicine 2010;7:2661–2662.
  
  
• Fanelli D. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data. PLoS One 2010;5(4):e10271.
  
  
• Finch A. Can we do better than existing author citation metrics? Bioessays 2010;32:744–747.
  
  
• Larsen PO, von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 2010;84(3):575–603.

Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 36(3), August 2010 - Nov 8, 2010 - 10:04 AM

• Buela-Casal G. Scientific journal impact indexes and indicators for measuring researchers’ performance. Revista de Psicodidactica 2010;15(1):3–19

Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 36(2), May 2010 - Nov 8, 2010 - 9:44 AM

• Aksnes DW, Rip A. Researchers’ perception of citations. Research Policy 2009;38(6):895–905.
  
  
• Crookes PA, Reis SL, Jones SC. The development of a ranking tool for refereed journals in which nursing and midwifery researchers publish their work. Nurse Education Today 2009:1532.
  
  
• Editorial. Conclusion by exclusion. Nature Genetics 2010;42:95.
  
  
• Smith DR, Rivett DA. Bibliometrics, impact factors and manual therapy: balancing the science and the art. Manual Therapy 2009;14(4):456–459.
  
  
• Van Nierop E. The introduction of the 5-year impact factor: does it benefit statistics journals? Statistica Neerlandica 2010;64(1):71–76.

Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 36(1), February 2010 - Nov 8, 2010 - 9:31 AM

• Calver MC, Bradley JS. Should we use the mean citations per paper to summarise a journal’s impact or to rank journals in the same field? Scientometrics 2009;81(3):611–615. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2229-y.
  
  
• Hartley J, Betts L. Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009;60(10):2010–2018.
  
  
• Hyett M, Parker G. Can the highly cited psychiatric paper be predicted early? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2009;43:173–175.
  
  
• Lyon L. Open science at web-scale: optimising participation and predictive potential. November 2009. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/documents/opensciencerpt.aspx.

Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 35(4), November 2009 - Nov 15, 2009 - 6:56 PM

• Allen L, Jones C,  Dolby K,  Lynn D, Walport M. Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(6):e5910.
  
  
• Bollen J, Van de Sompel H,  Hagberg A, Chute R. A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(6):e6022.
  
  
• Bourne PE, Fink JL. I am not a scientist, I am a number. PLoS Computational Biology 2008;4(12):e1000247.
  
  
• Safer MA, Tang R. The psychology of referencing in psychology journal articles. Perspective on Psychological Science 2009;4(1):51–53.
  
  
• Zhang C-T. The e-index, complementing the h-Index for excess citations. PLoS ONE 2009;4(5):e5429.