|
|
Journal :
Bookshelf :
Research evaluation
Vol 35(4), November 2009 - Nov 15, 2009 - 6:56 PM
- Allen L, Jones C, Dolby K, Lynn D, Walport M. Looking for landmarks:
the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating
scientific publication outputs. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(6):e5910.
- Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Chute R. A principal component
analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(6):e6022.
- Bourne PE, Fink JL. I am not a scientist, I am a number. PLoS Computational Biology 2008;4(12):e1000247.
- Safer MA, Tang R. The psychology of referencing in psychology journal
articles. Perspective on Psychological Science 2009;4(1):51–53.
- Zhang C-T. The e-index, complementing the h-Index for excess citations. PLoS ONE 2009;4(5):e5429.
Journal :
Bookshelf :
Research evaluation
Vol 35(3), August 2009 - Sep 29, 2009 - 12:01 PM
- Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD. Do we need the h index and its variants
in addition to standard bibliometric measures? JASIS&T
2009;60(6):1286–1289.
- Bourne PE, Fink JL. I am not a scientist, I am a number. PLoS Computational Biology 2008;4(12): e1000247.
- Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A
systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE
2009;4(5):e5738.
- Fersht A. The most influential journals: impact factor and eigenfactor.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009;106(17):6883–6884.
- Iribarren-Maestro I, Lascurain-Sánchez ML, Sanz-Casado E. Are
multi-authorship and visibility related? Study of ten research areas at
Carlos III University of Madrid. Scientometrics 2009;79(1):191–200.
- Johnston R. The extent of influence: an alternative approach to
identifying dominant contributors to a discipline’s literature.
Scientometrics 2009;78(3):409–420.
- Sypsa V, Hatzakis A. Assessing the impact of biomedical research in
academic institutions of disparate sizes. BMC Medical Research
Methodology 2009;9:33.
- Van den Besselaar P, Leydesdorff L. Past performance, peer review, and
project selection: A case study in the social and behavioral sciences.
Sigmetrics 2009.
- Williamson JR. My h-index turns 40: My midlife crisis of impact. ACS Chemical Biology 2009;4(5):311–313.
Journal :
Bookshelf :
Research evaluation
Vol 35(2), May 2009 - Sep 29, 2009 - 11:12 AM
- Banks M. Elsevier challenged over journal operations. Physics World 2009;22(1):10.
- Experts still needed: there are good reasons to be suspicious of
metric-based research assessment [editorial]. Nature 2009;457:7–8.
- Falagas ME, Lerodiakonou V, Alexiou VG. At what age do biomedical
scientists do their best work? FASEB Journal 2008; 22(12):4067–4070.
- Levitt JM, Thelwall M. Citation levels and collaboration within library
and information science. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology 2009;60(3):434–442.
- Van Leeuwen T. Testing the validity of the Hirsch-index for research
assessment purposes. Research Evaluation 2008;17(2):157–160.
- Cassi L, Corrocher N, Malerba F, Vonortas N. The impact of EU-funded
research networks on knowledge diffusion at the regional level.
Research Evaluation 2008;17(4):283–293.
Journal :
Bookshelf :
Research evaluation
Vol 35(1), February 2009 - Feb 12, 2009 - 7:09 PM
- Anderson TR, Hankin RKS, Killworth PD. Beyond the Durfee square:
enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics
2008;76(3):577–578.
- Ball P. A longer paper gathers more citations. Nature 2008;455:274–275.
- Haslam N, Ban L, Kaufmann L, Loughnan S, Peters K, Whelan J, Wilson S.
What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and
personality psychology. Scientometrics 2008;76(1):169–185.
|
|
|
|
