Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 34(2), May 2008 - Jul 13, 2008 - 6:46 PM

• Budden AE, Tregenza T, Aarssen LW, Koricheva J, Leimu R, Lortie CJ. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2008;23:4–6.
  (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008)
  
  
• Leydesdorff L. Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008;59(2):278–287.
  (doi: 10.1002/asi.20743)
  
  
• Shepherd PT. Final report on the investigation into the feasibility of developing and implementing journal usage factors. United Kingdom Serials Group, May 2007.
  
  
• Steckler A, McLeroy KR. The importance of external validity. American Journal of Public Health 2008;98(1):9–10
  (doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847)

Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 34(1), February 2008 - Jul 13, 2008 - 5:59 PM

• Barendse W. The strike rate index: a new index for journal quality based on journal size and the h-index of citations Biomedical Digital Libraries 2007;4:3. (doi: 10.1186/1742-5581-4-3)
  
  
• Vinkler P. Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science 2007;33:481–491. (doi: 10.1177/0165551506072165)

Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 33(4), November 2007 - Jul 11, 2008 - 7:22 PM

• Bornmann L, Daniel HD. Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007;58(8):1100–1107.
  
  
• Gawrylewski A. New site pits 'published' vs. 'posted': Nature Precedings raises questions over the value of sharing findings before submitting to peer review. The Scientist 2007 June 19.
  
  
• Macdonald S, KamRing J. Ring o' Roses: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies Journal of Management Studies 2007;44(4):640–655.
  
  
• Moore A. Can journalists help improve peer review? The Scientist 2007;21(7):25.

Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 33(3), August 2007 - Apr 20, 2008 - 11:23 PM

• Coleman A. Assessing the value of a journal beyond the impact factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007; 58(8):1148-1161.
  
  
• Williams G, Hobbs R. Should we ditch impact factors? BMJ 2007; 334:568–569.
  
  
• Brown H. How impact factors changed medical publishing and science. BMJ 2007; 334:561–564.
  
  
• Martyn C. Advice to a new editor. BMJ 2007; 334:586.
  

Journal : Bookshelf : Research evaluation
Vol 33(2), May 2007 - Apr 20, 2008 - 11:51 AM

• Campanario JM, Acedo E. 2007. Rejecting highly cited papers: The views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(5):734-743.
  
  
• Csako G. 2007. Analysis of the most highly cited articles from the 50-year history of CCA. Clinica Chimica Acta 375 (1-2):43-48.
  
  
• Ioannidis JPA. 2006. Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: analysis of journal ecosystems. PLoS One 1(1):e5.