|
|
Journal :
Bookshelf :
Editorial process
Vol 34(3), August 2008 - Aug 9, 2008 - 10:47 PM
- Banks M. Peer review gets the thumbs up. Physics World 2008;21(3):8.
- Luey B. Different kind of Profession: the Council of Editors of Learned
Journals (CELJ). Journal of Scholarly Publishing 2008;39(2):94–108.
- Macdonald S, Kam J. Aardvark et al. Quality journals and gamesmanship
in management studies. Journal of Information Science
2007;33(6):702–717.
Journal :
Bookshelf :
Editorial process
Vol 34(2), May 2008 - Jul 13, 2008 - 6:25 PM
- Dickersin K, Ssemanda E, Mansell C, Rennie D. What do the JAMA editors
say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for
publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of
editorial discussion. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2007;7:44.
(doi:
10.1186/1471-2288-7-44)
- Ware M. Peer review: benefits, perceptions and alternatives. London: Publishing Research Consortium, 2008.
Journal :
Bookshelf :
Editorial process
Vol 34(1), February 2008 - Jul 13, 2008 - 5:31 PM
- Brown D, Leith D. Integration of the research library service into the
editorial process. "Embedding" the librarian into the media. New
Information Perspectives 2007;59(6):539–549.
- Hauser M, Fehr E. An incentive solution to the peer review problem.
PLoS Biology 2007;5(4):e107. (doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050107)
Journal :
Bookshelf :
Editorial process
Vol 33(3), August 2007 - Apr 20, 2008 - 11:00 PM
- Falagas ME. 2007. Peer review in open access scientific journals. Open Medicine 2007; 1(1):49–51.
- Hames I. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals. Blackwell, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. 2007. xii, 293.
- Lieff Benderly B. Dealing with deception. ScienceCareers.org 2007 Jan 19.
- Regehr G, Bordage G. To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer. Medical Education 2006; 40:832–839.
- Schulz WG. Giving proper credit. Chemical & Engineering News 2007; 85(12):35–38.
|
|
|
|
